Thursday, October 13, 2011
Dreams redeaux
Somebody decide what this one is!
I dreamt I was on the phone with someone from my past who always had a knack for making me feel insignificant and unimportant and stupid. As usual, this person was working really hard to that end.
In my dream, I hung up the phone and told myself that one day I would be someone who never had to endure the feeling that I felt. And I dreamt this dream like a week ago, and I still remember it. I remember feeling so hurt and dreary.
What do you think? Think you could write a scene using this dream? Could you capture the feeling that I felt, that sinking stomach feeling that -- I don't know, the- I don't matter feeling. What word am I searching for? Insignificant works but it isn't really what I mean.
Oh well, I will think about it and post comments on Thursday. If you use this exercise, send me a link so I can read it!!
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Are You A Writer Or Not?
copyright 2011 by Ron Adams
On the dawning of the next National Novel Writer’s Month (NaNoWriMo) in November, I have been thinking about writing the perfect novel. Personally, I don’t think it can be done, nor should it. The purpose of exercises like NaNoWriMo is to practice writing, and you don’t practice to write the perfect novel. You practice writing to become a better writer, a better storyteller, and to create a story readers will want to read again and again.You practice to master structure and form, and to create characters that readers will identify with and stand the test of time.
The perfect novel, or the perfect writer for that matter, will never exist. However, this does not mean it’s not a worthwhile goal. Like any business, and I can say this because many of us writers in the early stages of our career have day jobs, you have to accept that you can improve and make your stories better. I live to re-write, even when I hate it, because I’ve learned something that can make my writing better.
When I wrote my first novel, I was pleased after all the edits and re-writes to find a publisher willing to take it on. Then the feedback came, and it was split between kind and complimentary and harsh and insulting. I went back and re-read the story, and I earned every criticism. Maybe not the insults, but the legitimate criticism was well founded. So when I finally got the rights to my story back, I went to work and re-did a lot of the story, tightened up the characterizations and plot, improved on the picky details, and tidied the language to improve both structure and flow. I learned all these things along the way, mostly by writing, writing, writing. And in the end, the second edition of this story will be, I feel, a big improvement over the original, and much more readable.
If you’ve ever told anyone that you are a writer, and I know this has happened to me, eventually you will find someone who says they have always wanted to write, and eventually they will give you an avalanche of reasons they have never quite gotten to it. What separates a real writer from the dreamers, is the willingness to put in the hours, to hone their skills, to learn their craft and to never stop doing all those things. So, are you a writer, or what?
Monday, October 10, 2011
October Writing Critique by the MB4 Team
Comment from Kim Smith:
Kathy- I think this one is almost there. I could feel Jack’s angst, but didn’t understand why, which intrigued me. Then, I didn’t understand why he was so rude to the bartender after going to a place he KNEW would be loud and busy-and obviously have slow service- and he went there purposefully to stay away from a more personal atmosphere. Maybe this is explained better by reading more than this tidbit? Any way, it made him unlikeable to me. Also, if he truly wished to be anonymous and left alone to drown his sorrows, it seems like to me he wouldn’t be aching for someone to talk to, either, not as you say he was doing when Joe arrived. Just thought I would point out your motivations, and how you may have veered off course. Thank you for your contribution here at Mb4!
Comment from Marta Stephens:
This is quite good and intrigues me enough to want to read more. The only comment I have is that some the sentence are short and choppy. They could be connected (see example) in order to reduce the number of pronounce used. Nice! SEE SEGMENT BELOW WITH YELLOW HIGHLIGHTS.
Suggestions from Marta on combining sentences to make it a little less choppy:
Friday, October 7, 2011
Misconceptions About Literary Agents, by Andy Ross
Let's face it. Most of you who have never worked with a literary agent probably think that the 15% agency commission is sort of …well…unfair. A kind of baksheesh paid to the middleman in the literary souk who can use his connections to get you access to the celebrity editor at Knopf. Most published writers will tell you otherwise. Check out the acknowledgements page at the back of any book. Authors love their agents, and recognize that the agent's work goes far beyond dickering over deal points.
Here are a few of the misconceptions about agents that seem to be going around in writers' circles.
1) It's better to be represented by a New York agent. Obviously I'm annoyed by this surprisingly widely held belief, since I live and work in the San Francisco Bay Area. A lot of writers seem to think that getting published is all about the agent's physical proximity to editors and the number of times per month they have lunch with them. The famous "publisher's lunch" is from another era. And it is unclear that this was an important ritual in the acquisition process even then. All of the editors I talk to will tell you that the key consideration of an acquisition decision is whether the book has commercial potential. Publishers are under incredible pressure from their multimedia conglomerate parent corporations to make money on every book they publish. If your book is a bad business proposition, no amount of martinis at lunch is going to convince the publisher otherwise. I talk to a lot of book editors even though I work in California. They tell me that the most important thing you can provide them with is a convincing book proposal. You don't have to be in New York to do that.
2) It's better to be represented by a big (prestigious) New York agency. There are no good or bad agencies. There are just good or bad agents. That said, there are some advantages to having one of these big agencies on your side, but not the advantages that you might think. At the end of the day a celebrity agent isn't going to give you an edge, and can't deliver a contract for a project that would not otherwise get published. If you have a big book with lots of subsidiary rights opportunities (movie deals, foreign markets, merchandise tie-ins), it would be nice to have a big agency that could seamlessly handle all these deal elements. But even there, most good independent agents can serve you well.
And there is a downside to working with these big agencies as well. They are extremely selective in the projects they take on. A lot of these agencies are not looking for new writers. If you aren't a literary superstar, you might be better served by a newer agent who is building a list and is willing to take some chances by seeking out new talent. And always, always, you are better served by an agent who has the time and the imagination to help you shape your ideas and the passion to believe in your talent. You want an agent who will not just flip a contract but who will work with you to develop your career as a writer. There are some very good agents at the big New York agencies who will do this and other agents who are just too busy. The same is true of independent agents.
3) The agent's 15% commission is a rip off. It's payola to get your foot in the door. Actually, sometimes that's true. I've heard a lot of stories about agents who have done very little other than send your proposal around (usually to the same ten editors they like to work with) and then either drop you or flip a contract and disappear. That's a bad agent. If you are going to give an agent a 15% commission, you might as well make sure that she is earning it. The work of an agent is a lot more than sending out your project and dickering over deal points. A good agent will help you refine your idea in a way that will make it easier to sell, will lead you through the book proposal process, may even provide detailed edits on your novel or memoir, will negotiate the contract, will be your advocate during the publishing process, will help you exploit all the subsidiary rights opportunities for the material in the book, and will advise you on promotion when the book comes out. A good agent will earn that 15%. So try to find one of those.
4) I went with the agent who promised me the six figure deal. Most of the agents I know won't do this, but I still hear about it from writers. It's pretty hard to predict what kind of publisher advance a project will draw these days. What I can predict is that the advance offers will be a whole lot lower than they were several years ago. It's important to have an agent whom you can trust. Anyone who employs this kind of enticement is pretty suspect.
5) A good agent can get me a lot more money. This is a little complicated. An agent can work with you to develop a concept that is more attractive (and valuable) to a publisher and can help you compose a book proposal that will generate excitement from an acquiring editor. If there is competition for your book from several publishers, an agent can employ some sophisticated bargaining strategies to help improve a deal offer. And an agent can negotiate contract terms that may address issues affecting future royalties. But if you are in a situation with only a single publisher making an offer, one must assume that the publisher knows in advance how much she is willing to pay for a project. The job of the agent is to find out what that number is. In spite of what they may tell you, agents are not in possession of alchemical powers that will turn lead into gold. An agent can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
6) A good agent can help me find a prestigious editor. This might or might not be true, but the real misconception is whether or not the writer will be better off with a "prestigious" editor. I believe that the best editor for a project is the editor who understands and believes in that project. This might be the editorial director of a large imprint, but it might also be a young assistant editor hungry for building a list. Recently I spoke to an author whose editor was one of these legendary guys in publishing. The author was unhappy, because he felt the editor didn't give him the time he needed. I believe that. I had one client who insisted that I only send his work to the most prestigious editors working at the most prestigious imprints, regardless of whether those editors had any interest in the subject being written about. One of the most common causes for rejection is: "this book doesn't really fit my list." A good agent will find you an editor who believes in your book. That is more important than having a superstar editor.
7) Never work with an inexperienced agent. Since I was an inexperienced agent not too long ago, I fully understand the downside of working with one. There are lots of things in book publishing that a person can only learn from experience. Fortunately I had been in the book business for 35 years when I became an agent and came onto the job knowing quite a bit, but there were still lots of holes in my knowledge. A lot of agents, many in the big agencies, can be pretty young and inexperienced. But this is not always such a bad thing. Some of these agents are pretty sharp and have a good eye for a project. And they are more likely to take a chance on a new writer. In the book business, developing new talent is a thankless but important job and it usually falls to the agents who have not yet built their lists.
Do yourself a favor. Find an agent who earns his commission.
Check out some of Andy's clients, here:

Andy Ross has been a literary agent since January 2008. Prior to that, he was the owner of Cody's Books in Berkeley, California for 30 years.
Andy specializes in non-fiction, particularly narrative non-fiction, history, current events, and journalism as well as literary and young adult fiction. He has secured book contracts in other genres as well. Andy has served on the faculty of numerous writers conferences and has conducted workshops on writing non-fiction book proposals and working with a literary agent.
Andy is a member of the Association of Author Representatives (AAR).
Check out his website and blog:
Website: www.andyrossagency.com
Blog: "Ask the Agent" www.andyrossagency.wordpress.com
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Writing for the Market
If you write the books you love then someone will love them too, even if it is not something that the buying public shows interest in today. Trends come and go in publishing and what is popular today is not really relevant by the time the book is released a couple years later.
This is another reason I love working with small independent publishers. They do not follow trends, they publish what sells well for them, and they take on projects that speak to them as a reader. Good news for writers!
So, I have written a new YA fantasy, Loran Rudder and the Secret Key, and by the time this post goes live, will have sent it to my YA publisher, Moongypsy Press and even though this is my sixth full-length novel to go out, I am still on the wings of the glow of accomplishment. PS- Since writing this post and queuing it up, I received edits from Red Rose on Crooked Angel, the next Shannon Wallace mystery! Yay! I may have TWO books out soon. Life is good :) What have you done lately? Tell us!
Monday, October 3, 2011
Interview with author Stephen L. Brayton
http://stephenlbrayton.blogspot.com
http://braytonsbookbuzz.blogspot.com
SLB.
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Chasing the Writing High
It's October. The Finger Lakes region has been beautiful lately, really gorgeous with its purple asters and bright yellow golden rod, deep blue skies and hints of red and orange colors streaking the hillsides.
I've been waiting for this moment forever. All year, really. I dubbed the year of 2011 "the year of endless edits," because that's all I've been doing since January.
It's not a bad thing, it's really part of a great trend with my publisher. She's decided she wants to release more of my backlogged books, rather than release just one or two a year. We have the first two Tall Pines Mysteries, books 2 and 3 in Moore Mysteries, a new LeGarde Mystery, and two "author's preferred edition" rewrites from the early LeGarde series, all of which are scheduled for release in the next six months, and all which required focused edits.
Compared to last year, 2011 really stunk. I mean, in 2010 I wrote three new books. I was on a constant writing high. Some prerequisite editing came in between (for FireSong, just released in July), but all in all, it was a very satisfying year for filling my aching need to create. Last week I sent in the final edited manuscript for Upstaged. Done! Fertig! Fini! I was excited to start book three in my new Tall Pines series. Frankly, I was crazy with enthusiasm. After all, nothing gives me a thrill like writing fresh stuff. New stories. New twists. New characters. It's pure. It's fun. And I love it so much it can be scary.
To be honest, right up front, I need to tell you that I normally don't research my books very much.
There. I said it. As terrible as that is, it's true. I write from my experiences and also make up a lot of stuff. I know, I'll look bad by admitting this. But I can't pretend to be who I'm not.
This time, however, my new featured character comes from a Seneca reservation, where she's fleeing a monster who wants her dead. I don't know much about the reservation, except that my daughter and her husband used to go there for cigarettes when they used to smoke. To help with the background, I ordered four books from Amazon to teach me about the Senecas. Then I started to plan the book.
I started to panic. I couldn't make up my mind on characters, ages, plot elements. I drove myself crazy, woke up in the middle of the night worrying about it.
This is my sixteenth book. What was wrong with me? I started to wonder - what if I'm done? What if I never come up with another good idea again? Why can't I just plunge into this like I always do?
I've been doing this torturous "planning" all week, changing my mind a hundred times, talking to my writing pals about it, and going... nowhere.
This morning, I decided enough was enough! I've been craving writing for so long, wanting it so bad, that I was starting to get depressed. It was time to just start.
So I did. I let the first chapter out through my fingers onto the keyboard, and thus Catori was born, with all her problems throbbing in the foreground and with a nice clear picture appearing in my head. I don't really know where this story is going, except that I've got to help this poor girl escape her tormentor, bring her to the Adirondacks (Tall Pines cabin) to be safe, and figure out how to bring down the bad guys.
Hey, someone's gotta do it.
I've gotta remember to write like the wind, and stop this over-thinking stuff. Right?
Think I'll go write chapter two.
***
Aaron Paul Lazar
Please visit my website or my page here on MB4!
![]() | Double Forte': A Gus LeGarde Mystery | First Book in LeGarde Mysteries |
![]() | Upstaged: A Gus LeGarde Mystery | Book 2 in LeGarde Mysteries |
![]() | Tremolo: cry of the loon Publisher: Twilight Times Books | Book 3 in LeGarde Mysteries |
![]() | Mazurka (A Gus LeGarde Mystery) | Book 4 in LeGarde Mysteries |
![]() | FireSong | Book 5 in LeGarde Mysteries |
![]() | Healey's Cave | First Book in Moore Mysteries (Green Marble Mysteries) |










